ListOfLists.com Internet Directory

Home > Top > Health > Child Health > Circumcision > AAP 1999 Circumcision Position Statement
News ArticlesOrganization Responses to AAP 1999 Circumcision Statement

Surf these sites:
AAP circumcision video news release -- Real Player required - free download
Attorneys for the Rights of the Child (ARC) Response -- The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has been charged with continuing to betray vulnerable children in its release today of a new policy regarding circumcision.
CRC Response -- An excellent insightful review of the AAP policy - more than just the few highlights reported in the press. It describes the 7 signs of progress that the AAP is finally beginning to understand the effects of circumcision and the 9 deficiencies the report failed to address
InfoCirc of Montreal response -- Although the AAP says that the medical benefits of circumcision are not significant enough to recommend the procedure, their statement leaves wide latitude to continue circumcision for non-medical reasons. This is clearly a violation of medical ethics (physicians are only allowed to perform surgery when medically necessary).
NOCIRC International response -- Now that the American Academy of Pediatrics has aligned itself more closely with medical organizations worldwide by not recommending routine male circumcision, the already declining circumcision rate in the U.S. should drop dramatically.
NOCIRC of Illinois response -- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Affirms that Claimed Medical Benefits Do Not Justify Routine Infant Circumcision; At Last Recognizes the Pain and Stress of Circumcision; Tragically Omits Crucial Information Necessary for Parents to Make an Informed Decision
NOCIRC of Maine response -- AAP Refuses to Endorse Infant Circumcision for 26 Years Running.
NOCIRC of North Carolina response -- Children''s health advocates lauded the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) today for its refusal to recommend infant circumcision. The AAP policy has now come in line with all of the other medical societies'' circumcision policy statements in the English speaking world. This position underscores the idea -- widely accepted around the world -- that circumcision does not specifically contribute to children''s health in any way. In countries that do not circumcise, including all of continental Europe, urological health appears to be as good as, or better, than in the United States.
NOCIRC of North Dakota response -- AAP Fumbles Again: Contradicts Itself
NOHAHMM response -- Doctors'' Group Charged with Dumping Kids'' Rights
NORM response -- Pediatric Circumcision Policy Better, But Still Inadequate. - "At last the AAP has admitted that it is both unnecessary and painful. R. Wayne Griffiths, NORM''s founder, notes that "now it is clear that the greatest danger to a baby boy''s penis is from a doctor''s knife."
Pediatrics in Review -- Medical journal. Most web site features require subscription.

Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
Submit a Site - Open Directory Project - Become an Editor